Contact Us
Partner Portal
Help Desk

Crider Foods Streamlined the Power of Qlik

In South Georgia, Crider Foods has carved a niche as a leading poultry manufacturer specializing in canned chicken products and a diverse range of poultry, beef, pork, turkey, and ready-to-eat meals. A family-run business with a rich 45-year history, Crider Foods has experienced substantial growth and has come to understand that scalability and sustainability require technological advancements beyond the traditional methods steeped in manual processes and gut instincts. Joshua Poole leads the BI Team, specifically Qlik and ERP systems initiatives. He recognized it was time to move beyond the memory of floor workers to a reliable system for data-driven insights.

Going from Manual Memory to Automated Analytics Was the First Major Step

Faced with the transition from reliance on gut feelings, handwritten schedules, and rudimentary Excel spreadsheets to an Enterprise System with integrated subsystems, Crider Foods recognized that a new phase was imminent. The company needed to harness data to fuel its business decisions and maintain a competitive edge. They wanted to break away from the confines of old-school, manual methods that saw key personnel overburdened and knowledge confined to a few experienced heads. In the past, the company may have operated effectively in the short term, but such practices needed to be more scalable and sustainable.

They started working with Qlik Sense, which was both a blessing and a curse. Company personnel were in awe of how quickly they could obtain insights, and usage exploded. However, guidelines needed to be established for who would own Qlik Sense and maintain its accuracy, and their small development team was quickly operating over capacity.

However, Increased Qlik Development Led to Bigger Challenges

As Crider Foods embarked on its Qlik Sense analytics transformation, the quick adoption led to an unstructured proliferation of apps, resulting in discrepancies and inefficiency. With almost 1,000 employees making requests for new reports and changes to existing reports, analytics became like the wild, wild west. The development team had to move beyond a single person and determine a method to gain control of its analytics development. They wanted to define who would own it and maintain its accuracy. “We didn’t have any kind of control,” Joshua stated. “We would redo a lot of data. You might look at an inventory app over here, and it says this, and another one over here built for a different reason might show something else. There was a lot of disparate information. Our analytics grew way too fast, and there was no one source of truth.” They had to step back to lay a better foundation for development. Instead of having several people in different departments creating apps, they made one central, expanded development team. This larger team and the more significant number of analytics requests, however, created new issues. There was a lot of time spent backtracking and working over one another. They needed to find a way to tackle version control and revision tracking.

Gitoqlok Completed the Automation Journey and Streamlined Development

That is when Joshua found Motio’s presentation on Gitoqlok at the annual worldwide Qlik conference. Joshua stated, “I didn’t know enough to look for a solution, but as soon as I saw it, I knew we had to have it. I downloaded the trial before leaving the conference — that’s how urgent and fitting the solution was to our needs.”

Gitoqlok offered Crider Foods the version control and structure they desperately needed. It made a huge difference, providing peace of mind that you can track your latest changes. “With our small team, bandwidth is around 100 tests per week, plus we receive approximately 200 requests, some big and some small, so we are always working beyond capacity,” said Joshua. With the team at capacity, simplifying their work was imperative. Sometimes, errors happen. When this occurs, it’s an effortless rollback to get to the previous version and move on. It removed the guesswork and brought peace of mind that they delivered accurately.

Version control and rollback are not the only Gitoqlok tools used. Crider Foods gets through what Joshua terms “non-value-added time” items. They’ve cut the time it takes to do mundane tasks almost in half using Gitoqlok’s:

  • Side-by-side comparison of dashboards and scripts
  • Publishing straight from the app rather than going back to the hub
  • 1-Click Thumbnail creation
  • Tags for published vs unpublished sheets

In addition to the current capabilities Gitoqlok offers, Joshua is excited about the remarkable development capabilities. “I like to see a road map because I get excited about stuff before it comes up. The fact that Motio’s dev team is just adding new features that also may not even be related to what we first purchased. To me, that’s just awesome,” said Joshua.

Today, Crider Foods enjoys a well-managed process. They have automated procedures and enhanced consistency across their Qlik ecosystem. With Gitoqlok, Crider Foods says goodbye to guesswork. Changes are tracked with precision, allowing teams to roll back if necessary. The BI team has transformed from a total capacity to achieving 30% more in productivity and handling queries definitively rather than relying on memory. Poole says, “Gitoqlok is like having a perfect memory for our Qlik applications. It’s changed the game for us.”

Crider Foods is a stellar example of how companies entrenched in traditional operational schemas can pivot to a data-centric model with the right tools. With Gitoqlok, they’ve emerged with more efficiency, scalability, and precision.

Ready to streamline and automate your BI & analytics platforms?
Get A Demo
Solutions
Products
About Us
Resources
Contact
  • Tel:1 (972) 447-9595
  • Toll Free:1 (833) 855-3073
Follow Us
Youtube Linkedin Twitter
© 2024 Motio. All rights reserved
Scroll to Top
As the BI space evolves, organizations must take into account the bottom line of amassing analytics assets.
The more assets you have, the greater the cost to your business. There are the hard costs of keeping redundant assets, i.e., cloud or server capacity. Accumulating multiple versions of the same visualization not only takes up space, but BI vendors are moving to capacity pricing. Companies now pay more if you have more dashboards, apps, and reports. Earlier, we spoke about dependencies. Keeping redundant assets increases the number of dependencies and therefore the complexity. This comes with a price tag.
The implications of asset failures differ, and the business’s repercussions can be minimal or drastic.
Different industries have distinct regulatory requirements to meet. The impact may be minimal if a report for an end-of-year close has a mislabeled column that the sales or marketing department uses, On the other hand, if a healthcare or financial report does not meet the needs of a HIPPA or SOX compliance report, the company and its C-level suite may face severe penalties and reputational damage. Another example is a report that is shared externally. During an update of the report specs, the low-level security was incorrectly applied, which caused people to have access to personal information.
The complexity of assets influences their likelihood of encountering issues.
The last thing a business wants is for a report or app to fail at a crucial moment. If you know the report is complex and has a lot of dependencies, then the probability of failure caused by IT changes is high. That means a change request should be taken into account. Dependency graphs become important. If it is a straightforward sales report that tells notes by salesperson by account, any changes made do not have the same impact on the report, even if it fails. BI operations should treat these reports differently during change.
Not all reports and dashboards fail the same; some reports may lag, definitions might change, or data accuracy and relevance could wane. Understanding these variations aids in better risk anticipation.

Marketing uses several reports for its campaigns – standard analytic assets often delivered through marketing tools. Finance has very complex reports converted from Excel to BI tools while incorporating different consolidation rules. The marketing reports have a different failure mode than the financial reports. They, therefore, need to be managed differently.

It’s time for the company’s monthly business review. The marketing department proceeds to report on leads acquired per salesperson. Unfortunately, half the team has left the organization, and the data fails to load accurately. While this is an inconvenience for the marketing group, it isn’t detrimental to the business. However, a failure in financial reporting for a human resource consulting firm with 1000s contractors that contains critical and complex calculations about sickness, fees, hours, etc, has major implications and needs to be managed differently.

Acknowledging that assets transition through distinct phases allows for effective management decisions at each stage. As new visualizations are released, the information leads to broad use and adoption.
Think back to the start of the pandemic. COVID dashboards were quickly put together and released to the business, showing pertinent information: how the virus spreads, demographics affected the business and risks, etc. At the time, it was relevant and served its purpose. As we moved past the pandemic, COVID-specific information became obsolete, and reporting is integrated into regular HR reporting.
Reports and dashboards are crafted to deliver valuable insights for stakeholders. Over time, though, the worth of assets changes.
When a company opens its first store in a certain area, there are many elements it needs to understand – other stores in the area, traffic patterns, pricing of products, what products to sell, etc. Once the store is operational for some time, specifics are not as important, and it can adopt the standard reporting. The tailor-made analytic assets become irrelevant and no longer add value to the store manager.