MotioCAP and MotioCAP-SAML – Cognos Authentication

Custom authentication providers and SAML solutions for Cognos.

Overview

There are times when Cognos customers face the challenge of integrating Cognos with their security infrastructure. Motio uses its years of deep Cognos experience to provide turn-key solutions, customized to your specific needs, and fully supported.

When it comes to securing Cognos, Motio has the experience to integrate with your security provider using either our MotioCAP or MotioCAP-SAML solution, depending upon your preferences and needs.

Motio frees you from the time sink of doing this on your own, or the cost of hiring security talent that might not be there when Cognos is updated or other issues arise. Motio knows precisely how to build it right. And we are always there to help keep you tightly integrated with your security provider.

Features

When your chosen authentication source is not available in Cognos you are faced with coding your own integration. This requires a rare and specialized skill set that is knowledgeable at the functionality and API levels of authentication standards and Cognos Analytics.

Motio frees you from finding the right developer, the time and effort required to build it and maintain it as Cognos releases new versions. MotioCAP and SAML frameworks ensure that your integration is done correctly and efficiently to avoid knowledge gaps of how Cognos works with security. Save time, effort, and be safe and secure.

Experts In IBM Cognos Authentication Providers & SAML

When it comes to security for our clients there is no room for error. We’ve been selected by branches of the US Military, Fortune 500 companies as well as academic and financial institutions to provide the security experience they require in Cognos.

Ongoing Support & Security

Establishing the integration and providing the desired security experience isn’t the end. Clients rely and entrust us to test, maintain and update their integration as needed with new releases of Cognos.

Meeting Your Authentication Needs

Motio Custom Authentication Providers provide flexibility and adaptability to enable authentication for Cognos against many non-standard sources:
Scroll to Top
As the BI space evolves, organizations must take into account the bottom line of amassing analytics assets.
The more assets you have, the greater the cost to your business. There are the hard costs of keeping redundant assets, i.e., cloud or server capacity. Accumulating multiple versions of the same visualization not only takes up space, but BI vendors are moving to capacity pricing. Companies now pay more if you have more dashboards, apps, and reports. Earlier, we spoke about dependencies. Keeping redundant assets increases the number of dependencies and therefore the complexity. This comes with a price tag.
The implications of asset failures differ, and the business’s repercussions can be minimal or drastic.
Different industries have distinct regulatory requirements to meet. The impact may be minimal if a report for an end-of-year close has a mislabeled column that the sales or marketing department uses, On the other hand, if a healthcare or financial report does not meet the needs of a HIPPA or SOX compliance report, the company and its C-level suite may face severe penalties and reputational damage. Another example is a report that is shared externally. During an update of the report specs, the low-level security was incorrectly applied, which caused people to have access to personal information.
The complexity of assets influences their likelihood of encountering issues.
The last thing a business wants is for a report or app to fail at a crucial moment. If you know the report is complex and has a lot of dependencies, then the probability of failure caused by IT changes is high. That means a change request should be taken into account. Dependency graphs become important. If it is a straightforward sales report that tells notes by salesperson by account, any changes made do not have the same impact on the report, even if it fails. BI operations should treat these reports differently during change.
Not all reports and dashboards fail the same; some reports may lag, definitions might change, or data accuracy and relevance could wane. Understanding these variations aids in better risk anticipation.

Marketing uses several reports for its campaigns – standard analytic assets often delivered through marketing tools. Finance has very complex reports converted from Excel to BI tools while incorporating different consolidation rules. The marketing reports have a different failure mode than the financial reports. They, therefore, need to be managed differently.

It’s time for the company’s monthly business review. The marketing department proceeds to report on leads acquired per salesperson. Unfortunately, half the team has left the organization, and the data fails to load accurately. While this is an inconvenience for the marketing group, it isn’t detrimental to the business. However, a failure in financial reporting for a human resource consulting firm with 1000s contractors that contains critical and complex calculations about sickness, fees, hours, etc, has major implications and needs to be managed differently.

Acknowledging that assets transition through distinct phases allows for effective management decisions at each stage. As new visualizations are released, the information leads to broad use and adoption.
Think back to the start of the pandemic. COVID dashboards were quickly put together and released to the business, showing pertinent information: how the virus spreads, demographics affected the business and risks, etc. At the time, it was relevant and served its purpose. As we moved past the pandemic, COVID-specific information became obsolete, and reporting is integrated into regular HR reporting.
Reports and dashboards are crafted to deliver valuable insights for stakeholders. Over time, though, the worth of assets changes.
When a company opens its first store in a certain area, there are many elements it needs to understand – other stores in the area, traffic patterns, pricing of products, what products to sell, etc. Once the store is operational for some time, specifics are not as important, and it can adopt the standard reporting. The tailor-made analytic assets become irrelevant and no longer add value to the store manager.