Why Data Products Cannot Succeed Without Lessons from Marketing

In a small city in the Northeast, Dye-or-Die, Inc., a shampoo manufacturer, prided itself on its elaborate production methods. However, their intense focus on how they made shampoo left them disconnected from their true audience.

One day, Rachel, the new marketing director, attended a local fair and overheard customers discussing their hair struggles. Inspired, she realized the company was missing vital insights from the very people they served. The team began hosting feedback sessions, inviting loyal customers to share their experiences.

Armed with this feedback, Dye-or-Die, Inc. shifted its focus. They reimagined their products based on client needs rather than production bragging rights. Their campaigns evolved to highlight real customer transformations through testimonials, creating a sense of community and connection.

Sales soared as customers appreciated the genuine engagement. Dye-or-Die, Inc. transformed from a brand emphasizing its manufacturing process into a beloved name recognized for listening to and prioritizing its clients—a key driver of true innovation and satisfaction.

The Disconnect in Data & Analytics (D&A) Management

Much like Dye-or-Die, Inc., many Data & Analytics (D&A) managers are primarily focused on the production process of data products. They emphasize data governance and data dictionaries and follow the ongoing debates between Bill Inmon and Ralph Kimball with keen interest. While keeping up with innovations in strategic data management is essential, an overemphasis on how data is produced, governed, and maintained misses a critical factor: consumer engagement.

Let me ask you: How many D&A leaders consider the foundational work of Philip Kotler, the founding father, and leader in marketing thought, when developing data products? Not many, I guess. Yet, there’s a reason Gartner, Inc. asserts that “Data products are defined by how they are consumed, rather than by how they are produced or the functionality they offer” in their paper “3 Competitive Differentiators of Successful D&A Leaders” (published on September 18, 2024).

Two Critical Marketing Principles for D&A Managers

In our Dye-or-Die, Inc. example, the company initially focused on its production process—but customers simply didn’t care. This is where marketing best practices provide valuable lessons for D&A leaders. Two essential principles stand out:

1. Implementing a Feedback Loop to fuel product innovation 

In marketing, it is standard practice to implement product feedback loops when introducing new offerings. This continuous cycle involves collecting customer feedback, analyzing it, and making necessary improvements to the product or service.

For data products, establishing a robust feedback loop is crucial. It ensures that offerings truly meet the needs of stakeholders and continuously improve. Without this, D&A managers risk building products that lack adoption and miss opportunities to innovate and enhance their products.

2. Measuring Success Through Key Metrics

Marketers measure the success of their feedback loops using key metrics such as Feedback Response Rate, Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT), and Net Promoter Score (NPS). These insights help them refine messaging, enhance engagement, and reduce wasted marketing spend.

Similarly, D&A managers should track adoption rates, user satisfaction, and data product effectiveness. By leveraging these metrics, they can ensure the power and potential of their data products are understood, and usage of these data products drives meaningful business impact.

Analytics Asset Management: The Missing Piece

In 2019, the concept of Data as a Product gained popularity, largely driven by Zhamak Dehghani’s introduction of data mesh. Data products are designed for analytical use cases, featuring domain-centric ownership and cross-domain usability. Their value is based on consumption, with governance automated through federated computational mechanisms. These products are provisioned via self-service platforms like PowerBI, Tableau, and Qlik, making them easily accessible to business analysts and power users.

However, a critical component is missing—one that marketers inherently understand. This is where Analytics Asset Management® (AAM) plays a vital role.

To build effective consumer feedback loops in data products, domain teams must understand what assets are being created on these data products, how they are used, and the adoption trends over time. Usage patterns and shifts in adoption provide crucial insights for improving data products. Additionally, understanding the purpose, user groups and asset types helps establish appropriate service level agreements (SLAs).

An Example of AAM in Action

Consider a skilled D&A manager who aims to transform the HR department by developing a new data product. While analyzing reports and dashboards, she discovered that many HR analysts relied on manually uploaded Excel files to enrich their data—indicating a gap in the data offered.

Further investigation revealed that the existing organizational chart was insufficient, not only leading to additional work for analysts but also to inaccuracies in reporting. Some analysts uploaded old data or did not maintain it. To address this, she analyzed the missing information and enhanced her ETL processes to incorporate additional data points. Armed with insights on the volatility of the analytics assets that should be improved, she informed self-service users about the updated data product and identified which analysts needed additional support.

This overhaul not only improved efficiency but also ensured reports were accurate and reflected the correct organizational structure. Teams could generate reliable insights faster, fostering trust in the data they depended on for decision-making. This example underscores the vital role of automated feedback loops in driving organizational success.

Why D&A Leaders Should Embrace Analytics Asset Management

Analytics Asset Management provides the framework and the toolset for D&A managers to tailor their offerings, ensuring data products align closely with the key performance indicators (KPIs) that business partners rely on. By leveraging AAM, D&A leaders can:

  • Gain real-time insights into data product adoption and usage.
  • Ensure stakeholders receive actionable insights faster.
  • Streamline efforts for efficiency and effectiveness of self-service analytics.
  • Strengthen collaboration and cultivate a data-driven culture.

Conclusion

The lessons from marketing are clear—understanding your audience, incorporating feedback loops, and measuring effectiveness are essential for success. Just as Dye-or-Die, Inc. revolutionized its approach by listening to customers, D&A managers must shift from production-focused thinking to consumption-driven strategies.

By integrating marketing principles and adopting Analytics Asset Management, data leaders can build truly valuable data products that drive business success. The key to innovation isn’t just in how data is produced but in how it is consumed and continuously improved.

Scroll to Top
As the BI space evolves, organizations must take into account the bottom line of amassing analytics assets.
The more assets you have, the greater the cost to your business. There are the hard costs of keeping redundant assets, i.e., cloud or server capacity. Accumulating multiple versions of the same visualization not only takes up space, but BI vendors are moving to capacity pricing. Companies now pay more if you have more dashboards, apps, and reports. Earlier, we spoke about dependencies. Keeping redundant assets increases the number of dependencies and therefore the complexity. This comes with a price tag.
The implications of asset failures differ, and the business’s repercussions can be minimal or drastic.
Different industries have distinct regulatory requirements to meet. The impact may be minimal if a report for an end-of-year close has a mislabeled column that the sales or marketing department uses, On the other hand, if a healthcare or financial report does not meet the needs of a HIPPA or SOX compliance report, the company and its C-level suite may face severe penalties and reputational damage. Another example is a report that is shared externally. During an update of the report specs, the low-level security was incorrectly applied, which caused people to have access to personal information.
The complexity of assets influences their likelihood of encountering issues.
The last thing a business wants is for a report or app to fail at a crucial moment. If you know the report is complex and has a lot of dependencies, then the probability of failure caused by IT changes is high. That means a change request should be taken into account. Dependency graphs become important. If it is a straightforward sales report that tells notes by salesperson by account, any changes made do not have the same impact on the report, even if it fails. BI operations should treat these reports differently during change.
Not all reports and dashboards fail the same; some reports may lag, definitions might change, or data accuracy and relevance could wane. Understanding these variations aids in better risk anticipation.

Marketing uses several reports for its campaigns – standard analytic assets often delivered through marketing tools. Finance has very complex reports converted from Excel to BI tools while incorporating different consolidation rules. The marketing reports have a different failure mode than the financial reports. They, therefore, need to be managed differently.

It’s time for the company’s monthly business review. The marketing department proceeds to report on leads acquired per salesperson. Unfortunately, half the team has left the organization, and the data fails to load accurately. While this is an inconvenience for the marketing group, it isn’t detrimental to the business. However, a failure in financial reporting for a human resource consulting firm with 1000s contractors that contains critical and complex calculations about sickness, fees, hours, etc, has major implications and needs to be managed differently.

Acknowledging that assets transition through distinct phases allows for effective management decisions at each stage. As new visualizations are released, the information leads to broad use and adoption.
Think back to the start of the pandemic. COVID dashboards were quickly put together and released to the business, showing pertinent information: how the virus spreads, demographics affected the business and risks, etc. At the time, it was relevant and served its purpose. As we moved past the pandemic, COVID-specific information became obsolete, and reporting is integrated into regular HR reporting.
Reports and dashboards are crafted to deliver valuable insights for stakeholders. Over time, though, the worth of assets changes.
When a company opens its first store in a certain area, there are many elements it needs to understand – other stores in the area, traffic patterns, pricing of products, what products to sell, etc. Once the store is operational for some time, specifics are not as important, and it can adopt the standard reporting. The tailor-made analytic assets become irrelevant and no longer add value to the store manager.