Contact Us
Partner Portal
Help Desk

HELP! MY QLIK CLOUD RELOAD EXCEEDS QUOTA!

Qlik Cloud Reload Exceeds Quota

If you are a Qlik Cloud (SaaS) customer you may have seen this dreaded message during script reload. Ack! Ack!

Your quota may be different than 25Mb, but the problem remains the same. How do I modify this application to fit within my subscribed quota?

QSDA Pro V3.1 to the the rescue! QSDA analyzes your app and provides recommendations and easy to use tooling to drop unused data and optimize the remaining data, potentially greatly reducing the size of your Qlik App.

QSDA needs a successfully loaded app for analysis, so our first step is to reload the app using the “Limited load” feature of the Qlik script debugger.

Click the Debug button in the Qlik script editor, check the Limited load option, accept the default of 100 rows and click “Run” to initiate the reload. The reload will come in under your quota. When the reload completes, key Ctrl-s to persist the data.

You don’t have a business-ready app, but this is enough for QSDA to scan all charts, expressions and master items to determine what data is actually required.

In QSDA Pro we now select our Cloud connection and select the app of interest, in this case “BikeShop Sales2”. Click the “Open” button to prepare the app for analysis. I will also uncheck the “Collect Calctime” option because chart calculation times are not meaningful with our limited data. Description is optional, in this case I’ve entered “Limited Load”.

Click the “New Analysis” button to launch the QSDA Pro analysis. The analysis may take a minute or two to complete depending on the capacity of your tenant and the current Qlik Cloud load. When the analysis is complete press the “View” button to see the results.

In the Summary view we see there are 89 unused fields. Unused fields are fields that are not used in any charts, master items or expressions. These are fields that can be dropped at the end of script without impacting the user experience in the app. The actual storage numbers (KiB) are not meaningful because we only loaded 100 rows. The bar chart is useful in that is indicates about 2/3 of our data is unused. Hope!

QSDA provides a Script Generator in the Tools menu to generate a “DROP Fields …” script statement for unused fields. Select the script generator from the Tools menu.

In the Script Generator > Drop Fields tab select the top checkbox to select all recommended fields. Press the “Copy” button to copy the generated Drop Fields statement to your clipboard.

Paste the Drop Fields statement at the end of your Qlik Script and reload.

Reload successful! Victory!

A subsequent QSDA analysis shows the app size has been reduced from the problematic 37Mb to 15MB!

QSDA Pro can quickly and efficiently get your Qlik Apps below your Qlik Cloud quota by pruning unnecessary data. Don’t pay for more than you need.

In a follow up post I’ll walk through some additional QSDA features to help you reduce Qlik app footprint even further and improve chart response time to boot.

Download QSDA Pro and try it for yourself. Or reach out to us to learn more about license options or arrange a demo or POC for your team.

-Rob

Ready to streamline and automate your BI & analytics platforms?
Get A Demo
Solutions
Products
About Us
Resources
Contact
  • Tel:1 (972) 447-9595
  • Toll Free:1 (833) 855-3073
Follow Us
Youtube Linkedin Twitter
© 2024 Motio. All rights reserved
Scroll to Top
As the BI space evolves, organizations must take into account the bottom line of amassing analytics assets.
The more assets you have, the greater the cost to your business. There are the hard costs of keeping redundant assets, i.e., cloud or server capacity. Accumulating multiple versions of the same visualization not only takes up space, but BI vendors are moving to capacity pricing. Companies now pay more if you have more dashboards, apps, and reports. Earlier, we spoke about dependencies. Keeping redundant assets increases the number of dependencies and therefore the complexity. This comes with a price tag.
The implications of asset failures differ, and the business’s repercussions can be minimal or drastic.
Different industries have distinct regulatory requirements to meet. The impact may be minimal if a report for an end-of-year close has a mislabeled column that the sales or marketing department uses, On the other hand, if a healthcare or financial report does not meet the needs of a HIPPA or SOX compliance report, the company and its C-level suite may face severe penalties and reputational damage. Another example is a report that is shared externally. During an update of the report specs, the low-level security was incorrectly applied, which caused people to have access to personal information.
The complexity of assets influences their likelihood of encountering issues.
The last thing a business wants is for a report or app to fail at a crucial moment. If you know the report is complex and has a lot of dependencies, then the probability of failure caused by IT changes is high. That means a change request should be taken into account. Dependency graphs become important. If it is a straightforward sales report that tells notes by salesperson by account, any changes made do not have the same impact on the report, even if it fails. BI operations should treat these reports differently during change.
Not all reports and dashboards fail the same; some reports may lag, definitions might change, or data accuracy and relevance could wane. Understanding these variations aids in better risk anticipation.

Marketing uses several reports for its campaigns – standard analytic assets often delivered through marketing tools. Finance has very complex reports converted from Excel to BI tools while incorporating different consolidation rules. The marketing reports have a different failure mode than the financial reports. They, therefore, need to be managed differently.

It’s time for the company’s monthly business review. The marketing department proceeds to report on leads acquired per salesperson. Unfortunately, half the team has left the organization, and the data fails to load accurately. While this is an inconvenience for the marketing group, it isn’t detrimental to the business. However, a failure in financial reporting for a human resource consulting firm with 1000s contractors that contains critical and complex calculations about sickness, fees, hours, etc, has major implications and needs to be managed differently.

Acknowledging that assets transition through distinct phases allows for effective management decisions at each stage. As new visualizations are released, the information leads to broad use and adoption.
Think back to the start of the pandemic. COVID dashboards were quickly put together and released to the business, showing pertinent information: how the virus spreads, demographics affected the business and risks, etc. At the time, it was relevant and served its purpose. As we moved past the pandemic, COVID-specific information became obsolete, and reporting is integrated into regular HR reporting.
Reports and dashboards are crafted to deliver valuable insights for stakeholders. Over time, though, the worth of assets changes.
When a company opens its first store in a certain area, there are many elements it needs to understand – other stores in the area, traffic patterns, pricing of products, what products to sell, etc. Once the store is operational for some time, specifics are not as important, and it can adopt the standard reporting. The tailor-made analytic assets become irrelevant and no longer add value to the store manager.