Motio, Inc. Acquires QSDA Pro

Post: Motio, Inc.® Acquires QSDA Pro


Motio, Inc Acquires QSDA Pro

Adding Testing Capabilities to the Qlik Sense® DevOps Process

PLANO, Texas – 02 May, 2023 – On the heels of QlikWorld 2023, Motio, Inc., the software company that automates tedious administrative tasks and streamlines cumbersome BI development processes, announces the acquisition of QSDA Pro. This purchase joins two Qlik® validated software products creating further automation of the Qlik Sense development process by adding testing.

“Motio builds DevOps solutions for Qlik Sense and Qlik SaaS,” stated Edwin van Megesen, VP of Business Development. “Soterre™ is our zero-touch version control and deployment tool that works without creating an administrative burden for developers. Testing is a critical aspect of CI/CD, and with QSDA Pro we now offer automatic testing of apps, that again aid the developer. We want to empower developers to succeed without impeding their data design.”

In 4Q 2021, Motio acquired Gitoqlok providing seamless integration into Qlik, easing lifecycle management, and opening the door to better serve the Qlik community and support Qlik’s cloud strategy. Building on this success and its integration with Soterre, Motio continues to seek ways to create the most accurate and reliable Qlik implementation possible. QSDA Pro fits that strategy. In that same vein, we will continue to utilize the expertise of QSDA Pro founder, Rob Wunderlich.

“Today, more than ever, it is important to find a company that meshes with your vision and values. Motio, Inc. does that.”, stated Rob Wunderlich, Founder of QSDA Pro and Qlik Partner Ambassador. “We both see the importance of following developmental best practices and providing the tools necessary to ensure developers can identify and resolve issues to minimize the risks of production issues. While Motio acquired QSDA Pro, I am not going anywhere. I will continue to be instrumental in the development of the product and its integration into the Motio suite.”


About Motio:

At Motio, we don’t make business intelligence and analytics software. We make it better by giving you the tools to triumph over your BI congestion. We want to improve the lives of our customers and help them excel at their jobs. We do this by building innovative software tools that streamline workflows and inefficiencies within BI & Business Analytics platforms. For more information visit Follow Motio, Inc. on LinkedIn and Twitter.

About QSDA Pro:

QSDA Pro is a tool that allows users to quickly and easily identify issues and errors in their Qlik Sense applications allowing the delivery of cleaner, leaner, faster apps. For more information visit

Motio, Inc. Media Contact:
Sherie Wigder
Director of Marketing

Motio, Inc.

Scroll to Top
As the BI space evolves, organizations must take into account the bottom line of amassing analytics assets.
The more assets you have, the greater the cost to your business. There are the hard costs of keeping redundant assets, i.e., cloud or server capacity. Accumulating multiple versions of the same visualization not only takes up space, but BI vendors are moving to capacity pricing. Companies now pay more if you have more dashboards, apps, and reports. Earlier, we spoke about dependencies. Keeping redundant assets increases the number of dependencies and therefore the complexity. This comes with a price tag.
The implications of asset failures differ, and the business’s repercussions can be minimal or drastic.
Different industries have distinct regulatory requirements to meet. The impact may be minimal if a report for an end-of-year close has a mislabeled column that the sales or marketing department uses, On the other hand, if a healthcare or financial report does not meet the needs of a HIPPA or SOX compliance report, the company and its C-level suite may face severe penalties and reputational damage. Another example is a report that is shared externally. During an update of the report specs, the low-level security was incorrectly applied, which caused people to have access to personal information.
The complexity of assets influences their likelihood of encountering issues.
The last thing a business wants is for a report or app to fail at a crucial moment. If you know the report is complex and has a lot of dependencies, then the probability of failure caused by IT changes is high. That means a change request should be taken into account. Dependency graphs become important. If it is a straightforward sales report that tells notes by salesperson by account, any changes made do not have the same impact on the report, even if it fails. BI operations should treat these reports differently during change.
Not all reports and dashboards fail the same; some reports may lag, definitions might change, or data accuracy and relevance could wane. Understanding these variations aids in better risk anticipation.

Marketing uses several reports for its campaigns – standard analytic assets often delivered through marketing tools. Finance has very complex reports converted from Excel to BI tools while incorporating different consolidation rules. The marketing reports have a different failure mode than the financial reports. They, therefore, need to be managed differently.

It’s time for the company’s monthly business review. The marketing department proceeds to report on leads acquired per salesperson. Unfortunately, half the team has left the organization, and the data fails to load accurately. While this is an inconvenience for the marketing group, it isn’t detrimental to the business. However, a failure in financial reporting for a human resource consulting firm with 1000s contractors that contains critical and complex calculations about sickness, fees, hours, etc, has major implications and needs to be managed differently.

Acknowledging that assets transition through distinct phases allows for effective management decisions at each stage. As new visualizations are released, the information leads to broad use and adoption.
Think back to the start of the pandemic. COVID dashboards were quickly put together and released to the business, showing pertinent information: how the virus spreads, demographics affected the business and risks, etc. At the time, it was relevant and served its purpose. As we moved past the pandemic, COVID-specific information became obsolete, and reporting is integrated into regular HR reporting.
Reports and dashboards are crafted to deliver valuable insights for stakeholders. Over time, though, the worth of assets changes.
When a company opens its first store in a certain area, there are many elements it needs to understand – other stores in the area, traffic patterns, pricing of products, what products to sell, etc. Once the store is operational for some time, specifics are not as important, and it can adopt the standard reporting. The tailor-made analytic assets become irrelevant and no longer add value to the store manager.