NY Pizza vs Chicago Pizza

Post: NY Style vs. Chicago Style Pizza: A Delicious Debate

When satisfying our cravings, few things can rival the joy of a piping hot slice of pizza. The debate between New York-style and Chicago-style pizza has sparked passionate discussions for decades. Each style has its own unique characteristics and devoted fans. Today, we’ll delve into the key differences between these two legendary pizza styles and explore the arguments for each. So, grab a slice and join us on this mouthwatering journey!

NY Style Pizza: A Thin Crust Delight

New York-style pizza is renowned for its thin, foldable crust that delivers the perfect combination of chewiness and crispiness. Fans of NY-style pizza argue that its thin crust and quick preparation time make it the ideal choice for a fast and delicious meal. It’s perfect for the on-the-go eaters of NY. It’s the quintessential slice that captures the essence of the bustling city.

The crust is typically baked in industrial ovens at high temperatures, resulting in a shorter baking time (12-15 minutes). This quick bake helps achieve the signature leopard spots and slightly charred edges that add extra flavor to each bite.

Toppings on NY-style pizza are often smaller since the slices are generally larger, and one distinctive feature is the oil that surfaces at the top, giving the pizza its distinct sheen and enhancing the overall flavor.

Chicago Style Pizza: Deep-Dish Indulgence

If you’re looking for a pizza experience more like a hearty meal, Chicago-style pizza is the answer. Deep-dish delight boasts a thick crust baked in a pan, allowing for a generous amount of toppings and fillings. The cheese is layered directly on the crust, followed by fillings and a rich tomato sauce.

You have to keep your hunger in check regarding deep-dish pizza. Due to its thickness, Chicago-style pizza requires a longer baking time (45-50 minutes) to ensure the crust is perfectly golden and the fillings get cooked to perfection. The result is a satisfying, indulgent pizza experience that will leave begging for mercy.

Supporters of Chicago-style pizza praise its deep-dish structure and the substantial number of toppings. The layers of cheese, fillings, and sauce create a symphony of flavors in every bite. It’s a pizza that demands to be savored and enjoyed leisurely, perfect for a sit-down meal with friends and family.

Crunching the Crust: Pizza Statistics Revealed

  • Three billion pizzas are sold every year in the United States worth over $46 billion
  • Every second, an average of 350 slices are sold.
  • Approximately 93% of Americans eat at least one pizza per month.
  • On average, each person in America eats about 46 pizza slices a year.
  • More than 41% of us eat pizza every week, with one in eight of all Americans eating pizza on any given day.
  • The pizza industry sells more than $40 billion in products annually.
  • Roughly 17% of all restaurants in the U.S. are pizzerias, with more than 10% of the country’s pizzerias located in NYC.

Source: https://zipdo.co/statistics/pizza-industry/

Regarding NY vs. Chicago-style pizza, the stats are less clear. We know from the Factual map below that was posted in The Washington Post that A map of the united states Description automatically generated

  • New York style rules the coastal and southern states, while Chicago style holds fast in the middle of the country,”
  • 27 states and Washington, D.C. prefer thin crust, compared to the 21 which prefer deep dish.
  • Regular thin crust is most popular in America; it is preferred by 61% of the population, 14% prefer deep-dish, and 11% prefer extra thin-crust
  • Approximately 214,001,050 Americans prefer thin crust (blue states), compared to the 101,743,194 Americans who prefer deep dish (red states).

Interestingly enough, New York and Illinois do not even make the top 10 US states that eat the most pizza (Source: https://thepizzacalc.com/pizza-consumption-statistics-2022-in-the-usa/)

  1. Connecticut 6. Delaware
  2. Pennsylvania 7. Massachusetts
  3. Rhode Island 8. New Hampshire
  4. New Jersey 9. Ohio
  5. Iowa 10. West Virginia

However, finding the actual number of pizzas sold in each style is impossible to find! We searched hundreds of different ways only to find that you can buy pizza online to ship to your house.

What we discovered by pizza style:

Description Chicago-Style New York-Style
Number of Pizza Restaurants/City 25% 25%
Average Number Slices/14” Pizza 8 10
Average Slices Eaten/Person 2 3
Average Calories/Slice 460 250
Number of Pizza Consumed per Person/Year 25.5 64.2
Average Cost/ Large Cheese Pizza $27.66 $28.60
Average Google Rating of Pizza 4.53 4.68

Data Doesn’t Always Settle the Debate

We like to think data has all the answers, but when it comes to food, oftentimes, things are subjective. In the chart below, we outline “winning” criteria by pizza style.

Category Chicago-style New York-style
Google Rating 4.53 4.68
Cost Large Cheese $27.66 $28.60
Calories 460 250
Average Size 12” 18”
Crust Thicker Thinner
Toppings Lots Simpler
Oil Less Greasy
Slices Rectangular Triangular
Baking Time 40-50 Minutes 12-15 Minutes
Value (Calories/Dollar) 133.04 87.41

As you can see there is no runaway winner. Even celebrities weigh in on the debate, and it really does come down to preference. Dave Portnoy, BarStool Sports (who’s never short on opinions) proclaimed a NY pizza “the best he’s ever had” (https://youtu.be/S7U-vROxF1w?si=1T3IZBnmgiCCn3I2) and then turns around and says deep-dish is the “Chicago go to” (https://youtu.be/OnORNFeIa2M?si=MXbnzdkplPyOXFFl)

So, if you’re in the mood for a quick slice or a large pizza and tend to rely on Google ratings, you might enjoy the New York-style pizza. However, if you value getting more bang for your buck in terms of calories, don’t have a problem with carbs, and don’t mind waiting a bit longer, you can’t go wrong with the Chicago-style pizza. Next time you’re craving a slice, try both styles and see which one wins your heart. And remember, no matter which style you prefer, pizza is always a delicious treat that’s worth the indulgence!


Scroll to Top
As the BI space evolves, organizations must take into account the bottom line of amassing analytics assets.
The more assets you have, the greater the cost to your business. There are the hard costs of keeping redundant assets, i.e., cloud or server capacity. Accumulating multiple versions of the same visualization not only takes up space, but BI vendors are moving to capacity pricing. Companies now pay more if you have more dashboards, apps, and reports. Earlier, we spoke about dependencies. Keeping redundant assets increases the number of dependencies and therefore the complexity. This comes with a price tag.
The implications of asset failures differ, and the business’s repercussions can be minimal or drastic.
Different industries have distinct regulatory requirements to meet. The impact may be minimal if a report for an end-of-year close has a mislabeled column that the sales or marketing department uses, On the other hand, if a healthcare or financial report does not meet the needs of a HIPPA or SOX compliance report, the company and its C-level suite may face severe penalties and reputational damage. Another example is a report that is shared externally. During an update of the report specs, the low-level security was incorrectly applied, which caused people to have access to personal information.
The complexity of assets influences their likelihood of encountering issues.
The last thing a business wants is for a report or app to fail at a crucial moment. If you know the report is complex and has a lot of dependencies, then the probability of failure caused by IT changes is high. That means a change request should be taken into account. Dependency graphs become important. If it is a straightforward sales report that tells notes by salesperson by account, any changes made do not have the same impact on the report, even if it fails. BI operations should treat these reports differently during change.
Not all reports and dashboards fail the same; some reports may lag, definitions might change, or data accuracy and relevance could wane. Understanding these variations aids in better risk anticipation.

Marketing uses several reports for its campaigns – standard analytic assets often delivered through marketing tools. Finance has very complex reports converted from Excel to BI tools while incorporating different consolidation rules. The marketing reports have a different failure mode than the financial reports. They, therefore, need to be managed differently.

It’s time for the company’s monthly business review. The marketing department proceeds to report on leads acquired per salesperson. Unfortunately, half the team has left the organization, and the data fails to load accurately. While this is an inconvenience for the marketing group, it isn’t detrimental to the business. However, a failure in financial reporting for a human resource consulting firm with 1000s contractors that contains critical and complex calculations about sickness, fees, hours, etc, has major implications and needs to be managed differently.

Acknowledging that assets transition through distinct phases allows for effective management decisions at each stage. As new visualizations are released, the information leads to broad use and adoption.
Think back to the start of the pandemic. COVID dashboards were quickly put together and released to the business, showing pertinent information: how the virus spreads, demographics affected the business and risks, etc. At the time, it was relevant and served its purpose. As we moved past the pandemic, COVID-specific information became obsolete, and reporting is integrated into regular HR reporting.
Reports and dashboards are crafted to deliver valuable insights for stakeholders. Over time, though, the worth of assets changes.
When a company opens its first store in a certain area, there are many elements it needs to understand – other stores in the area, traffic patterns, pricing of products, what products to sell, etc. Once the store is operational for some time, specifics are not as important, and it can adopt the standard reporting. The tailor-made analytic assets become irrelevant and no longer add value to the store manager.