Post: Turbocharge Your Analytics Implementation with CI/CD

In today’s fast-paced digital landscape, businesses rely on data-driven insights to make informed decisions and gain a competitive edge. Implementing analytics solutions effectively and efficiently is crucial for deriving valuable information from data. One way to achieve this is by leveraging a proper Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) process. In this blog post, we will explore how a well-defined CI/CD process can significantly improve your analytics implementation.

Faster GTM

With CI/CD, organizations can automate the deployment of analytics code, resulting in faster time to market for new features and improvements. By streamlining the release process, development teams can implement and test changes more frequently, allowing businesses to quickly adapt to evolving market demands and gain a competitive advantage. Faster GTM With CI/CD

Minimize Human Error

Manual deployment processes are susceptible to human error, leading to misconfigurations or inconsistencies across environments. CI/CD automation minimizes such errors by enforcing consistent and repeatable deployment procedures. This ensures the accuracy and reliability of your analytics implementation, preventing potential data inaccuracies and costly mistakes. Like Humble and Farley mention in their book Continuous Delivery, “Automate almost Everything”. Automation is the only way to eliminate human errors. If you discover a lot of documentation regarding certain steps or tasks, you know it is complex and you know it is executed manually. Automate!

Improved Testing

CI/CD promotes automated testing practices, including unit tests, integration tests, and regression tests. By incorporating these tests into your CI/CD pipeline, you can identify and rectify issues early in the development cycle. Thorough testing ensures that your analytics implementation functions correctly, providing accurate insights and reducing the risk of relying on faulty data.

Streamlined Collaboration

CI/CD fosters collaboration among team members working on analytics implementation. Through version control systems like Git, multiple developers can simultaneously contribute to the project. Changes are automatically integrated, tested, and deployed, reducing conflicts and enabling efficient collaboration. This collaboration enhances the quality of the analytics solution and accelerates its development.

Continuous Feedback Loop

Implementing CI/CD allows you to continuously gather feedback from users and stakeholders. Frequent deployments enable you to collect valuable insights, analyze usage patterns, and iteratively improve the analytics solution based on real-world data and user needs. This iterative feedback loop ensures that your analytics implementation remains relevant and aligned with evolving business requirements. CI/CD Enables Continuous Feedback

Rollback and Recovery

In the event of issues or failures, a well-defined CI/CD process enables quick rollback to a stable version or deployment of fixes. This minimizes downtime and ensures uninterrupted availability and functionality of your analytics implementation. The ability to swiftly address and recover from issues is critical for maintaining the reliability of your analytics solution.

Scalability and Flexibility

CI/CD processes are easily scalable, accommodating growing analytics implementations and expanding teams. As your analytics project evolves, CI/CD pipelines can handle larger workflows, multiple environments, and integrations with other systems. This scalability and flexibility empower your analytics implementation to grow alongside your business needs. In the book The Phoenix Project by Gene Kim, Kevin Behr and George Spafford, an amusing situation is described. Bill Palmer, VP of IT Operations and main character in the book has a conversation with Erik Reid, Board Candidate, Guru. They talk about Scalability and Flexibility of delivery changes to production.

Erik: “Get humans out of the deployment process. Figure out how to get to ten deployments a day” [Background: the Phoenix project deploys once every 2-3 months]

Bill: “Ten deployments a day? I’m pretty sure that no one is asking for that. Aren’t you setting a target that’s higher that the business needs?”

Erik sighs and rolling his eyes: “Stop focusing on the deployment target rate. Business agility is not just about raw speed. It is about how good you are at detecting and responding to changes in the market and being able to take larger and more calculated risks. If you can’t out-experiment and beat your competitors in time to market and agility, you are sunk.”

Scalability and Flexibility contribute to a repeatable, reliable release process that delivers according the business required timelines.

And in the end….

A proper CI/CD process is instrumental in improving the efficiency, quality, collaboration, and agility of your analytics implementation. By automating deployments, reducing errors, enhancing testing practices, and establishing a continuous feedback loop, businesses can achieve faster time to market, accurate insights, and maintain a competitive edge in the data-driven landscape. Embracing CI/CD not only strengthens your analytics solution but also provides a foundation for continuous improvement and innovation.

Scroll to Top
As the BI space evolves, organizations must take into account the bottom line of amassing analytics assets.
The more assets you have, the greater the cost to your business. There are the hard costs of keeping redundant assets, i.e., cloud or server capacity. Accumulating multiple versions of the same visualization not only takes up space, but BI vendors are moving to capacity pricing. Companies now pay more if you have more dashboards, apps, and reports. Earlier, we spoke about dependencies. Keeping redundant assets increases the number of dependencies and therefore the complexity. This comes with a price tag.
The implications of asset failures differ, and the business’s repercussions can be minimal or drastic.
Different industries have distinct regulatory requirements to meet. The impact may be minimal if a report for an end-of-year close has a mislabeled column that the sales or marketing department uses, On the other hand, if a healthcare or financial report does not meet the needs of a HIPPA or SOX compliance report, the company and its C-level suite may face severe penalties and reputational damage. Another example is a report that is shared externally. During an update of the report specs, the low-level security was incorrectly applied, which caused people to have access to personal information.
The complexity of assets influences their likelihood of encountering issues.
The last thing a business wants is for a report or app to fail at a crucial moment. If you know the report is complex and has a lot of dependencies, then the probability of failure caused by IT changes is high. That means a change request should be taken into account. Dependency graphs become important. If it is a straightforward sales report that tells notes by salesperson by account, any changes made do not have the same impact on the report, even if it fails. BI operations should treat these reports differently during change.
Not all reports and dashboards fail the same; some reports may lag, definitions might change, or data accuracy and relevance could wane. Understanding these variations aids in better risk anticipation.

Marketing uses several reports for its campaigns – standard analytic assets often delivered through marketing tools. Finance has very complex reports converted from Excel to BI tools while incorporating different consolidation rules. The marketing reports have a different failure mode than the financial reports. They, therefore, need to be managed differently.

It’s time for the company’s monthly business review. The marketing department proceeds to report on leads acquired per salesperson. Unfortunately, half the team has left the organization, and the data fails to load accurately. While this is an inconvenience for the marketing group, it isn’t detrimental to the business. However, a failure in financial reporting for a human resource consulting firm with 1000s contractors that contains critical and complex calculations about sickness, fees, hours, etc, has major implications and needs to be managed differently.

Acknowledging that assets transition through distinct phases allows for effective management decisions at each stage. As new visualizations are released, the information leads to broad use and adoption.
Think back to the start of the pandemic. COVID dashboards were quickly put together and released to the business, showing pertinent information: how the virus spreads, demographics affected the business and risks, etc. At the time, it was relevant and served its purpose. As we moved past the pandemic, COVID-specific information became obsolete, and reporting is integrated into regular HR reporting.
Reports and dashboards are crafted to deliver valuable insights for stakeholders. Over time, though, the worth of assets changes.
When a company opens its first store in a certain area, there are many elements it needs to understand – other stores in the area, traffic patterns, pricing of products, what products to sell, etc. Once the store is operational for some time, specifics are not as important, and it can adopt the standard reporting. The tailor-made analytic assets become irrelevant and no longer add value to the store manager.